The luxuriant groves of Bau Kien’s villa: Criticism of the Director and executors

Regarding the controversy in the auction of villas of “Bau” Kien couple, the Director of District 10 Civil Judgment Execution Department and the executor in charge were criticized.

This information was said by Deputy Director General of the General Department of Civil Judgment Execution Nguyen Van Son at a regular press conference this afternoon by the Ministry of Justice.

According to Mr. Son, on the basis of inspection conclusions, the General Department of Civil Judgment Execution has directed the Civil Judgment Execution Department of Ho Chi Minh City to consider and handle officials who have committed mistakes in the auction of villas. No. 5 Ho Bieu Chanh (Ward 12, Phu Nhuan District, Ho Chi Minh City) of Ms. Dang Ngoc Lan and Mr. Nguyen Duc Kien (Bau Kien) – Former Vice Chairman of the Founding Council of ACB.

Lùm xùm đấu giá biệt thự của Bầu Kiên: Phê bình Chi cục trưởng và chấp hành viên
Deputy General Director of General Department of Civil Judgment Execution Nguyen Van Son

“The Civil Judgment Execution Department of Ho Chi Minh City has reviewed. However, based on the law, it is not to the extent of disciplinary enforcement, so this agency has sent a written criticism to the Director of the Judicial Execution Bureau District 10 and executors all over the city, “said Mr. Son.

Deputy General Department of Civil Judgment Execution said that if the wrongdoing is due to the fault of state agencies, he / she must be responsible for compensation according to regulations. When there are sufficient factors, the General Department of Civil Judgment Execution will have direction to ensure seriously transparency and publicity, ensuring the rights of citizens.

There is no basis to conclude whether the 21 micronutrients in school milk are good or bad

Also at the press conference, Mr. Dong Ngoc Ba, Director of the Department of Legal Document Inspection (Ministry of Justice) answered some information related to Circular 31/2019 / TT-BYT regulating requirements for Fresh milk products used in school milk program.

According to Mr. Ba, the issuance of a circular of ministries is within the jurisdiction and responsibility of the ministries for legality and rationality. Ministries, including the Ministry of Justice, are not authorized to pre-check whether a circular is issued or not.

The Department of Checking Legal Documents only checks the circulars after they are issued. The Ministry of Justice is only competent, and capable of checking the legality, not the authority to conclude whether a ministry’s circular is reasonable.

According to Mr. Ba’s analysis, regarding the legality of Circular 31 related to authority and content, fresh milk products used in school milk program are effective from 20/1, the Ministry of Health has authority to issue this provision.

“The addition of many micronutrients, the legality is not contrary to the text of the superior. So there is no basis to conclude whether the 21 micronutrients are good or bad and the Ministry of Justice has neither authority nor should made an official statement about this, “Mr. Ba said.

Particularly for the legality related to the procedure, Mr. Dong Ngoc Ba confirmed that he has received information with errors in posting the draft circular for comments. As a rule, a circular must be posted publicly on the Government Web Portal and the Ministry of Construction’s web portal for at least 60 days before being issued.

However, up to now, no official and complete information has been posted on the draft circular 31 on the portal as prescribed.

 Thu Hằng